Gentle Teaching

Gentle Teaching is way of living with those around us in a manner in which a “spirit of gentleness” is encouraged.  It is a way of life that enable us and those around to “feel safe, loved, loving and engaged.” (http://www.gentleteaching.com/gtis.htm)

“Gentle Teaching is a non violent approach for helping people with special needs and sometimes challenging behaviors that focuses on four primary goals of care-giving:

- teaching the person to feel safe with us

- teaching the person to feel engaged with us

- teaching the person to feel unconditionally loved by us

- teaching the person to feel loving towards us”

(http://www.gentleteaching.nl/indexus.htm)

The process of Gentle Teaching

The Gentle Teaching process is seen to be developed in three steps.

Step one involves the worker getting to know the individual and knowing “what it means to feel love and compassion” for them (http://www.gentleteaching.nl/indexus.htm).  This statement can conjure up a number of issues as the use of the word ‘love’ springs up.  People’s perception of love suggests an intimacy that is more physical than that expected within a caring relationship.  The difficulty with this is that the individual receiving care may have no other people involved in their lives other than those who are paid to be there or those whose are required to look after them.  So where does this human being experience the natural feeling of being loved by another?

The Gentle Teaching Institute says:

“The first step for the care giver is to develop new values which are congruent with the principles of the psychology of interdependence.  The most important values are:

  • a person isn't to be judged for what he does, but valued for who he is
  • everybody needs to feel safe, loved, loving and connected to others
  • trust is more important than obedience
  • interdependence is more important than independence”

(http://www.gentleteaching.nl/indexus.htm).

The process of Gentle Teaching involves the carer and individual building up a relationship that is more than staff to client but focuses on a companionship in which both parties feel safe.

Task

What makes you feel safe with someone?

For each of us there will be certain things that make us feel safe.  We must discover what makes the other person in the relationship feel safe with us.  In doing this we create a relation where the trust between the two enables a belief in each other that the foremost thought is for the wellbeing of the other.  This is the basis of all the other work involved providing care.  We create a situation where the individual does not feel inferior, judged nor controlled by the person sharing their life with them.

The second step in this process is for the carer to see past presenting problems. We have to begin to see challenging behaviour as a form of communication that arises when an individual is unable to effectively communicate their feelings around a certain situation.  The carer sharing this experience would need to look for ways of meeting the need, solving the problem, in partnership with the individual where possible, rather than looking to eliminate the resulting behaviour.  This is quite a different focus for us as we can often be in situations that have a behaviour driven focus.  We adopt a medical philosophy and cure all attitudes where all we are presented with must be dealt with before we think about the inner person.

We do not look at the individual in holistic terms but segmented into departmentalised conditions where a specialised focus is required on an individual basis.  Yet the concept behind Gentle Teaching suggests that what we are presented with is only a symptom of underlying issues and addressing the behaviour is like administering painkillers without looking at what is causing the pain.  If the treatment continues in this fashion deterioration sets in internally but the pain is covered over.  What is required is an in-depth look at the cause of the behaviour, an x-ray or even scan if you like, of the structure that enables functioning to investigate what is creating the pressure on the life of the individual.

Task

Think of a time when you have responded to the behaviour.  Compare the outcome of this situation with a time when your response was to the problem behind the behaviour. What difference did it make?

What Gentle Teaching tries to achieve is that posture of Solidarity as you approach any incident.  This is the key to enabling the young person to move away from the trigger to the behaviour with the help of a companion who almost escorts the young person back to that safe place.  How we approach the situation really does matter.  On the following page you will see different approaches used by people.  Gentle Teaching aims for the place of Solidarity which offers the young person the best opportunity to regain composure.

Warmth

OVERPROTECTION

(S)mothering care

Non-developmental

Victimising

A need to care without being challenged.

Dependency is taught and maintained.

Charity not rights

Ownership not empowerment.

SOLIDARITY (the one to aim for)

Protecting without smothering.

Unconditional acceptance.

Tolerance and warmth.

Focus on sharing, and interdependence.

Clear message of safety, security and support are given.

Focus on effective communication.

AUTHITARIAN

Repressive

Primitive

Focus on the elimination of behaviours.

Focus on order and teaching rules.

The onus is on the individual to change and conform.

COLD

Mechanical

Disregarding humanity

Disinterested

Focus on compliance, lawfulness, orderliness

Focus on punishment and restraint techniques and strategies

Feelings and spirit described as stimuli and responses.

Distancing

The aim of this is to establish the advantage of seeing past the presenting behaviour to enable continuity of care and personal growth for the individual receiving care using of our skills to help the individual to cope with the situation.

Here we find the root of the third step as identified by the Gentle Teaching Institute in the Netherlands.  You, as the care giver, will need to exercise all your skills when a situation arises in which the individual presents challenging behaviour.

Neil Thompson (2005) identifies specific skills required by social workers however; these skills are also a requirement of those working within social care.  The skills encompass a range of areas that may be consolidated into one event:

Communication skills

Reflection skills

Self-awareness skills

Creativity

Analytical skills

Thinking on your feet

Handling feelings

Humility

Self-management skills

Resilience

Presentation skills

Partnership skills

Co-ordination skills

Survival skills

Sensitivity and observation skills

(Thompson, 2005, P87 to 105)

Through adopting the right approach and using the correct skills you will find the development of a relationship that is not based on power, i.e. adult v child, but a companionship that allows the child to feel safe, engaged, loved and loving.

 

References

Special Connections Available online at: http://www.specialconnections.ku.edu/ [Accessed 08/06/12]

Gentle Teaching Institute in the Netherlands. The Process of Gentle Teaching. Available online at http://www.gentleteaching.nl/indexus.htm [Accessed 08/06/12]

Gentle Teaching International, Gentle Teaching, Available online at http://gentleteaching.sharevision.ca/default.aspx l [Accessed 08/67/12]

Thompson, N., 2005, Understanding Social Work - Preparing for Practice. 2nd Edition. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan



Category: Social Care

Reflective Practice

Reflective Practice

Introduction:

“...we must find ways of connecting our knowledge and understanding of society, policy and people with the actions we will take as social workers.”

“If we are to practise from this knowledge and theory, we must have ways of thinking which turn thinking into practice action. Reflection is a way of doing this.”

(Payne, M., 2002, P123)

Reflective Practice is a process through which practitioners consider their work practice with a view to improve that practice in a manner that will benefit the service user. The improvements may also benefit the practitioner and the professional body as methods of working are made more effective. Through such reflection individual practitioners allow for Continual Professional Development as practitioners further their Post Qualifying training recognising the need for enhancing the knowledge and competencies attained through accredited awards.

There are many perspectives on Reflective Practice but the work of Donald Allan Schön (1930 – 1997) has greatly influenced the area of Reflective Practice. The concepts of “Reflection-in-Action” and “Reflection-on-Action” (Schön, D. (1983)) describe the process of reflection in situ and after the event or specific piece of practice consecutively.

To further explain the process of “Reflection-in-Action” read the following case study:

A care worker was walking along the road with Jamie. Jamie required some assistance with balance whilst walking therefore took an arm of the care worker. As they walked the care worker noticed a man walking with a dog on a lead. From knowledge from past experience and reports from colleagues regarding Jamie the care worker knew this would cause Jamie a lot of distress. This is where the “Reflection-in-Action” process is put into practice. Jamie saw the dog and became agitated so the care worker took up a position between Jamie and the dog. Through gaining eye-contact and talking to Jamie the care worker diverted attention and offered support through holding out a hand, which Jamie took. Consequently, the hand of the care worker had the skin broken as Jamie gripped tightly.

It is important to recognise that the two processes are not unrelated as even the process of reflection-in-action will be influenced by some retrospective thinking on a prior event. Such thinking would involve a critical evaluation of the practice carried out and an assessment as to the effectiveness of that piece of work and how such evaluation can effect the enhancing of future practice. Therefore, we find ourselves using the process of “Reflection-on-Action” (Schön, D. (1983)).

Reflection is the bringing together of various elements that inform and/or enhance our knowledge and understanding and ultimately our practice. The elements impacting upon such come from various sources. Theoretical influences from training inform us of up to date research into specific practice based on subject specific issues as well as tried and tested methods of practice. Another very important influence is the information gained from the service user. The service user’s experience of receiving a service from the practitioner will enable the practitioner to glean knowledge that they would otherwise never have access to. Being on the receiving end of a service has many connotations for the service user. Even the balance of power in that some service users have a specific need identified. The approach adopted can enhance the empowerment of the service user or diminish their self esteem. There are some needs that are more socially acceptable; therefore, accountability for such is not laid upon the service user. The stigma associated with specific needs carry implications for the service user and an understanding of their experience would add to the meeting of their needs or the needs of others in similar circumstances.

The experience of the practitioner is in itself a key component in the reflective process.

Dewey’s Spiral (veiwed at: http://content.iriss.org.uk/reflectivepractice/textonly.html) acknowledges the evolving nature of practice and that each experience enhances further practice with service users. There are many encounters in the experience of the social worker that encourage the drawing on past experiences to enable the management of situations. The following case study is an example of “Reflection-on-Action”. (Schön, D. (1983))

One social care worker was working with a service user who was having some difficulty coping with the daily events within the care establishment. He appeared to be stuck within his mind and required help to shift from the difficulty he was having. In the same way he could not remove himself from the room that he was situated and was, as a result of his shouting, causing great distress to others who were quite vulnerable. The social care worker decided that the individual would follow the bag that holds items that were important to him, that day. The social care worker picked it up and asked the service user to come with the bag. The service user, in turn, picked the social care worker up and shook them. In the situation, the social care worker promptly put the bag down and this eased the stress for the service user.

As part of the “Reflection-on-Action” process the social care worker discussed the issue with colleagues and supervisors, staff in the residential unit the service user lived in to ascertain a more empowering way to assist the service user in such circumstances. After this the social care worker wrote a report for the service user’s file that described the situation and discussed possible methods of intervention.

Gillian Ruch discusses “the uniqueness of each situation encountered” in order to identify the complexities of reflective practice (Ruch, G., 2002, P202). As a result of the “uniqueness of each situation” we are not able to predict the exact nature of encounters. However, through the informing nature of theory, professional and personal experience, the experience of service users and the knowledge and experience passed on by colleagues and/or supervisors we enter the situation equipped with foreknowledge of possible outcomes resulting from the critical evaluation of all such influences. The revisiting of such encounters is an example of Schön’s “Reflection-on-Action” (Schön, 1983). It is nevertheless important to recognise that these are only assumptions, however reliably proven in the past, and external forces impacting upon the situation will affect how the situation plays out. The external forces impacting upon any given situation can vary. From an incident occurring in the service users life that you have no control over thus affecting the service user’s interactions, to something within our own experience affecting our interactions and responses to encounters. In considering this as we reflect upon any event we are left with a level of ignorance in the preparation for further encounters. In recognition of this, when we consider the previous case study, following incidents of this nature would have to be approached in an empowering manner, for the service user, through encouraging him to control his possessions and listening to him.

Ruth Goatly, (1999), discussed the model of Boud, Keogh and Walker (1985) stating that “This model highlights that experiences in learning combine, behaviour, ideas and feelings and all of these aspects need to be examined in the process of reflection”.

It is from the examination of such aspects that we gain a more holistic view of the circumstances surrounding an encounter. During the encounter we are not able to be devoid of feelings built on our own experiences and furthermore we will have ideas or perceptions as to the source of the behaviour the individual is displaying. There is, of course, the issue of our behaviour and its contribution to the encounter.

Whatever perspective we adopt the ultimate outcome for the reflective practitioner is the enhancement of the service they provide. This is a skill that has to be practiced and continually evolved as the nature of social work presents diverse facets.

“The complex and uncertain nature of social work, with its ethical base, legal accountability, responsibility for complex decision-making and risk assessment... requires social workers to engage in ongoing development, personal and professional, if they are to survive, respond effectively to users and clients, and manage the uncertainty which is endemic to the profession.”

(Lishman, J. as cited in Adams, R., Dominelli, L. and Payne, M., 2002, P96)

References

Ruch, G,. (2002). From Triangle to spiral: reflective practice in social work education, practice and research. Social Work Education, Vol. No 2, p199-216

Schon, D. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, New York, Basic Books.

Goatly, Ruth. (1999). Developing Skills of Reflection. Department of Health and Social Care. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire.

Boud, D., Keogh, R. and Walker, D. (1985). The Reflective Process in Context. London: Kogan Page.

Lishman, J. Personal and Professional Development & Payne, M. Social Work Theories and Reflective Practice in Adams, R., Dominelli, L. and Payne, M. (2002). Social Work. Themes, Issues and Critical Debates. Hampshire: Palgrave in association with The Open University. Second Edition

 
Category: Social Care

Building Blocks and Balloons

An Insight into Building Blocks and Balloons

 

Introduction

 

From my own educational experiences in school and further education I realised that I do not always recall information in the way others appear to.  My ability to remember concepts was challenged when using traditional methods of reading the same thing over again.  I found that I had to put a lot of work into writing out what I was supposed to take in several times before it took root in my memory and made sense in my understanding.  This was the origins of the building blocks model.  It had come from a desire to put concepts in a pictorial form, like using mind maps. I had been using mind maps but I found that I was not creating the order in my thinking that I was aiming for. My mind works in a way that when something is being spoken about many connected concepts come to mind.  Many relevant situations also come to mind that had links to what is being discussed.

 

 

I searched for a model that represented the way my mind was needing and the requirement for foundational thinking block that then enables other concepts to be used to fulfil that basic block.

I realise that I work better in picture form. I can recall pictures, colours and images much easier than remembering items that I have read. This is why the blocks and balloons have colour and, where appropriate, corresponding colours.

The model is a very versatile model and can be used in many areas of study or activity. You can be used to plan an essay as you identify what the focus of the assessment is to be and how you are going to apply the principles that you have been asked to write about. It could be that you have been asked to write about historical figures within world war two and you would choose one individual and the aspects of their life you are going to focus on. These become the building blocks for your writing. The balloons are how these aspects of the individual’s life played out and your reflections on those events.

Within the care industry I have used it to encourage carers to reflect on how their practice has guiding principles such as legislation, national care standards, codes of practice and care planning systems that are the foundation of any practice with any individual. Practice done with that individual must be grounded on these building blocks however; the individual practice will have guiding theories and concepts which are the awareness raising balloons. 

 

The model can be used to have a broader overview of the key service you are to provide for the individual but then you can look closer to specific situations that the individual may be struggling with to see how you can apply the fundamental building blocks as well as the specific theories and concepts and methods of intervention to that situation.
From the model you will see that there are two basic shapes. There are the building blocks which are the fundamentals of any subject or topic or activity. Whatever subject matter you are covering whether it is Maths, English Psychology or Sociology that are fundamental principles that you must adhere to within a given perspective. These fundamental principles become your building blocks. 

 

Speech Bubble: Rectangle: Area of TriangleFor instance, if you are doing the subject of maths and you are looking at the subject of volume or area. The building blocks can be the subject title of volume, area, mass etc.

 

Speech Bubble: Oval: ½ × b × h The corresponding balloon would be the formulae that covers your specific subject (ie half the base times the height) I would have the building block and a corresponding balloon in the same colour so that pictorially you can identify which balloon matches which block. You could even have another corresponding balloon with an example of using the formula.

 

It is important not to complicate it too much though for then your image gets confusing. 

 

This can also be a useful model for people who may be assessed as being dyslexic as way to break down complicated principles or concepts into fundamental building blocks and use the balloons as the application of the principles to practice or situations they may have to understand within the subject matter. 

 Educators or trainers could use it to introduce subjects or principles before delivering the training/ lesson. When going into the details of the subject you could refer to the model as a way of consolidating the information. When you are finished the training, you can summarise what learning has taken place and explore this learning can be applied in real time contexts. Throughout my own learning I have found it to be a valuable process where I apply the concept to a situation I have had.  When teaching or training over the last 13 years I have found that reflecting on the student’s/participant’s own experiences to be a vital part of ensuring a deeper, and applicable understanding has been gained.  Couple this with the Building Blocks and Balloons and you find a greater level of understanding of core concepts and even intricate processes if used in the correct manner.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Even within the area of sport such, as swimming, the model could be used.  The building block of any stroke would be the coaching requirements and Fina regulations. Your coach would instruct you on the principles of the stroke and then there is guiding legislation within Fina regulations that must be adhered to.  You can use the model to highlight areas you want to develop within your stroke and what your goals or targets are for specific sessions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Another use for the model could be as a signposting system for policies and procedures within any organisation. The basic values of the organisation to be identified within the building blocks and the names of the policy and procedure with the corresponding colour to be identified in the balloons. These then could be hyperlinked to documents that have the more detailed version of the policies and procedures. You could also further models with practice examples linked with flowcharts.

I have recently used to the model to demonstrate the key principles of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and the Data Protection Act 1998 for student on the HNC Social Services and Candidates doing the SVQ - Level 3 Social Services (Children and Young People) at SCQF level 7. The level of information will be determined by the information required so you would need to be careful not to over load the picture. These models are quite weighty but there are key pieces of knowledge the individual student must have to meet the standards.

 

 

Another important document that can be understood more easily by the employment of Building Blocks and Balloons is the Data Protection Act  2018

 

  


If you were to use the model you would reference the link (http://www.macmillancentreforlearning.co.uk/social-care/64-building-blocks-and-balloons.html) within the body of your writing and in your Reference page you would write:

 

Malcolm Macmillan, Macmillan Centre for Learning, 2017, Building Blocks and Balloons, Available online at: http://www.macmillancentreforlearning.co.uk/social-care/64-building-blocks-and-balloons.html, [Last accessed 02/05/2017]

 

I do hope that you find this to be a useful tool. I would be interested in finding out the different ways people are using this so if you are happy to let me know you can contact me at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

Regards,

 

Malcolm

 


 

 

 

 

Category: Social Care

Subcategories